| 
  
  
    	
  
  
	Articles 
  		
  
	
		Edwin 
		A. Shei 
		Edwin A. Shei (BMEd, VanderCook College of Music; MDiv., Alliance 
		Theological Seminary; DMin., Asbury Theological Seminary) has been 
		married to Vickie for thirty-six years.  He has been ordained with the 
		Christian and Missionary Alliance for fifteen years and served as a 
		pastor for eleven.  He was a workshop presenter for Peace and Safety in 
		the Christian Home (PASCH).  His dissertation “Persuasion and Church 
		Ministry as It Relates to Woman Abuse: An Evaluation of No Place for 
		Abuse on the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior of Asbury Theological 
		Seminarians” is accessible via
http://www.asburyseminary.edu/dmin/current_students/research/dissertations/shei_e.pdf  
  		Review of No Place for Abuse
  		by Edwin A Shei 
		Woman abuse in the United States is a crisis that tends to set secular 
		caregivers at odds with local churches.  Citing patriarchy and 
		subordination as the “seeds of wife abuse,” R. Emerson and Russell Dobash maintain, “This structure and ideology [patriarchy and 
		subordination] can be seen most starkly in the records of two societies 
		that provided the roots of our cultural legacy, the Romans and the early 
		Christians” see Dobash and Dobash pp. 33-34).  More and more Christians are supporting this 
		premise.  For instance, Alsdurf and Alsdurf state, “The connection which 
		many battered women make between their ability to suffer violence from 
		their husbands and their Christian commitment reflects, we believe, what 
		is widely taught within evangelical churches about the submission of 
		women in marriage” (see Alsdurf and Alsdurf p. 82). In view of the claim that churches 
		are part of the problem, the chances may seem slim that churches can 
		become part of the solution in eliminating woman abuse.  
 Kroeger and Nason-Clark argue that not only can churches play a role but 
		churches also have a responsibility in stopping woman abuse.  Recognizing 
		the complex nature of woman abuse and reflecting on the evangelical 
		Church, through No Place for Abuse, Kroeger (a church historian) and 
		Nason-Clark (a sociologist) challenge Christians to stand in opposition 
		to woman abuse, to promote nonviolent family living, and to work in 
		tandem with secular caregivers to eliminate woman abuse.  Along with 
		sociological evidence revealing the prevalence and severity of woman 
		abuse, including a penetrating look at woman abuse in Christian homes, a 
		primary contribution of this work is its discussion of various doctrines 
		in relation to woman abuse, such as the patriarchy and subordination 
		cited by Dobash and Dobash.
 
 The first four chapters of No Place for Abuse address the prevalence of 
		woman abuse in the world and churches at large while the last nine 
		chapters of the book present a biblical basis for and a discussion of 
		relevant theologies in condemning woman abuse.  The last chapter 
		challenges churches to take their rightful place among secular 
		caregivers in spreading a message of hope and healing to female victims.  The final 20 percent of the book is a compilation of six appendixes:
 
	(1) God Speaks Out against Abuse: Scripture Passages & 
	Principles (2) Scriptures That Condemn Abuse & Offer Comfort to Victims
 (3) Intervention Resources for Pastors
 (4) Educational Resources
 (5) Bible Studies for Groups
 (6) Resources for a Congregation
 Reading No Place for Abuse can be painfully convicting.  Utilizing global 
		statistics the authors clearly demonstrate the sorry phenomenon that 
		woman abuse is no small matter around the world, including woman abuse 
		in the United States.  Compounding the pain is the reality of woman abuse 
		in evangelical homes.  According to Kroeger and Nason-Clark, though no 
		multinational studies providing specific statistics on the prevalence of 
		woman abuse among evangelical believers exist, evidence that woman abuse 
		occurs in evangelical homes is all too common.  In support of this 
		premise and operating under the belief “that once people of faith and 
		church leaders have been confronted with the wrenching reality of the 
		prevalence of violence, they will want to do something about it,” 
		the authors provide examples throughout the book of woman abuse in 
		evangelical settings.  Along with the prevalence of woman abuse, 
		topics such as why men abuse and why women remain in abusive 
		relationships, how churches might respond (including a list of unhealthy 
		responses) in caring for abused women, along with confronting 
		perpetrators make up the first two chapters of the book.  
 Readers under conviction for churches’ failure to minister to abused 
		women are encouraged in the third chapter to learn that contrary to a 
		number of woman-abuse studies, pastors actually do more than pray with 
		victims and then send them back to their homes.  Also a factor involving 
		churches that is insightful and significant for the elimination of woman 
		abuse is data that clergy are one of the few groups who report having 
		counseling access to male perpetrators.  In short, churches have a 
		prominent role to play in preventing and eliminating woman abuse, but at 
		the same time churches need to come to terms with the reality of woman 
		abuse in Christian homes and the reality that the problem is too big and 
		too complex to be tackled by churches alone.  Consequently, along 
		with an inventory for “Ensuring Care and Compassion in the 
		Congregational Setting,” chapter 4 seeks to build bridges between 
		churches and secular caregivers in eliminating woman abuse.
 
 Reading No Place for Abuse can also be doctrinally challenging.  As with 
		the abolition of slavery, woman abuse challenges churches to examine 
		certain doctrines.  Comprising nine of the book’s thirteen chapters, the 
		theological discussions housed in chapters 5-13 make up the book’s 
		primary contribution to churches, in particular, and to woman-abuse 
		literature in general.  For churches to minister effectively to 
		abused women and to become a dynamic force in stopping woman abuse, they 
		need to be aware of relevant doctrines and understand their effect.
 
 Of first importance is the knowledge that siding with the oppressed, God 
		opposes the oppressor.  Not only is the female victim hurt by the 
		perpetrator’s abuse, but the perpetrator himself is adversely affected 
		in his relationship with God and others.  Furthermore, woman abuse, 
		having a generational component to it, harms the couple’s children.  Marriage, affording the most intimate of human relationships, is in 
		God’s economy intended to be a lifelong male-female relationship between 
		equals, characterized by mutual respect and sharing.  Thus along with 
		marital rape, not always viewed as part and parcel with sexual abuse, is 
		the use of manipulation or coercion (common in Christian homes).
 
 A common misinterpretation of Scripture having devastating effects for 
		victims of woman abuse is the teaching that a wife’s suffering brings 
		her husband to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ.  In reality, the 
		thinking that suffering domestic violence is redemptive serves to keep 
		women in abusive relationships while enabling their abusers to carry on 
		in their sin.  According to Kroeger and Nason-Clark, rather than an 
		exhortation for wives to endure abuse, submission in 1 Peter 3:1-4 
		“involves scrupulous fulfillment of all legitimate obligations of 
		marriage while upholding freedom to serve Christ.  The aim is not 
		subordination but conversion, not by enabling what is wrong but by 
		persisting in what is right" (see Kroeger and Nason-Clark p. 95).  Also of interest here is the authors’ 
		comments on Sarah’s obedience to Abraham (1 Pet. 3:6) and Jesus as the 
		Christian’s example (see chap. 7).
 
 Challenging to the family nostalgia popular in America’s Christianity is 
		the revelation of God at work in some of the most dysfunctional families 
		imaginable, including separated and divorced families.  Piggybacking the 
		Christian’s fascination with the ideal family is the reality that 
		denying, ignoring, or minimizing woman abuse for the sake of holding a 
		family together obstructs the work of the Holy Spirit.  “The Scriptures,” Kroeger and Nason-Clark 
		maintain, “offer the hope of healing for troubled families, but it 
		requires honesty, faith, hard work and the support of the believing 
		community " (see Kroeger and Nason-Clark p. 101).
 In the context of America’s quick-fix society, some elements of 
		forgiveness and repentance that will undoubtedly be disturbing but 
		nevertheless needful considerations in the context of woman abuse are 
		the realities that forgiveness is a hard road, and forgiveness does not 
		necessarily mean reconciliation.  Forgiveness, rather than a simple act 
		of human will, is a gift of enablement from God.  Repentance is the 
		reality of a changed lifestyle.  According to Kroeger and Nason-Clark, 
		“Too often Christians demand that others forgive immediately, before it 
		is appropriate or advisable, before there can be adequate contrition, 
		reflection or amelioration.”   Besides rushing 
		forgiveness, five other errors commonly associated with woman abuse are
 
	(1) denial(2) concealment, secrecy and silence
 (3) presuming on God’s protection
 (4) discouraging a victim from finding shelter
 (5) 
		boycotting available resources.
 Amid these challenges is the good news that abusers can change.  Therein, 
		however, the reader discovers yet another challenge, that is, change for 
		perpetrators of woman abuse does not come easily.  Though tempting, 
		helping abusers escape the consequences of their sin can be 
		counterproductive.  To date, group therapy and tough love are the most 
		productive means for the transformation of attitudes in perpetrators of 
		woman abuse.  Violence is not to be tolerated.  Abusers cannot properly 
		hold church offices, and Christian perpetrators unwilling to change are 
		to be excommunicated (Matt. 18:17). 
 Finally, churches are faced with the challenge of divorce as it relates 
		to cases of woman abuse.  Though divorce is clearly the least desirable 
		option, divorce is, nevertheless a biblical option that may be necessary 
		in wife-abuse cases.  While the first half of Malachi 2:16 reports the 
		Lord’s hatred of divorce, the second half of Malachi 2:16 reports the 
		Lord’s hatred of “a man’s covering his wife with violence as well as his 
		garment.” Common in cases of wife abuse, seven other things the Lord 
		hates according to Proverbs 6:16-17 are “haughty eyes, a lying tongue, 
		and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, 
		feet that hurry to run to evil, a lying witness who testifies falsely, 
		and one who sows discord in a family” (NRSV).  Insightful and crucial to 
		the divorce issue are the authors’ discussions of the breaking of the 
		marriage covenant and the meaning of Jesus’ use of porneia  (translated unchastity) in 
		Matthew 5:32 and 19:9 (NRSV).
 
 Summary
 Though at times painfully convicting and doctrinally challenging, 
		reading No Place for Abuse can ultimately be rewarding, as the closing 
		statement of the book contends:
 
	The Bible consistently pronounces God’s judgment on those who use their 
		power to inflict suffering on others.  Conversely, great blessing is 
		promised to those who use their power to alleviate the oppression and 
		suffering of others.  How will we respond to the challenge? (Kroeger and 
		Nason-Clark 143)  Great reward awaits those willing to rise above the pain of conviction 
		and meet the doctrinal challenges presented in this book in relation to 
		woman abuse.  The testimony of Mary Nella Bruce, whose small church rose 
		to the occasion by establishing refuge houses for abused women and their 
		children, is a case in point:  
	The Jubilee House and the WellSpring House helped us grow in our faith 
		as a local church.  We could see in visible and dramatic ways the results 
		of our standing with the oppressed, abused, widows, and orphans.  We 
		heeded the words of James, “Religion that is pure and undefiled before 
		God, the Father, is this: to care for orphans and widows in their 
		distress, and to keep oneself unstained by the world” (James 1:27, NRSV), 
		and we discovered that when you set yourself on the side of the weak, 
		God makes you strong  (see Bruce, p. 173). In overcoming the pain and wrestling through the challenges presented by 
		No Place for Abuse and to keep from becoming defensive or entertaining 
		the notion that evangelical bashing is occurring here, the reader does 
		well to remember the preface, which notes that this book was born out of 
		a request before the Women’s Commission of the World Evangelical 
		Fellowship (WEF): 
	The Women’s Commission of the WEF was asked to form a 
	task force on violence against women and to consider how the evangelical 
	church worldwide could offer compassion and healing to [woman abuse] 
	victims.  What is the extent of the problem of abuse? How are 
	evangelical churches responding to the suffering caused by violence in the 
	home? What theological principles can help the church offer hope in the 
	midst of crises, to families both inside and outside the fold? (see Kroeger 
	and Nason-Clark p. 8) My only regret in reading this book is the same I have in reading 
		woman-abuse literature in general, that is, the imago Dei, the most 
		crucial of doctrines in dealing with human abuse, is but a mere mention 
		in the space of the book’s two hundred pages.  Essentially the whole of 
		the imago Dei doctrine is contained in a single sentence where Kroeger 
		and Nason-Clark write, “In the creation story, male and female are made 
		equally in the image of God, as woman is drawn from the very substance 
		of man, to share his dreams, his intellect, his emotions, his 
		spirituality” (see Kroeger and Nason-Clark p. 85).   This description is much too short as the imago Dei 
		is the prima facie theology supporting non-abusive human relationships 
		(see Clines 53; Henry 546; Matthews 164).
 
  		WORKS CITED__________
 Alsdurf, James, and Phyllis.  Battered into Submission: The 
		Tragedy of Wife
		Abuse in the Christian Home. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 1998.
 
		Bruce, Mary Nella. “Creating Healing Environments for Abuse Survivors.” 
		Women,
		Abuse, and the Bible: How Scripture Can Be Used to Hurt or Heal. Eds. Kroeger
		and Beck. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1996, 161-74. 
		Clines, D. J. A. “The Image of God in Man.” Tyndale Bulletin 19 (1968): 
		53-103. 
		Dobash R. Emerson, and Russell Dobash. Violence against Wives. New York: 
		Free, 1979. 
		Henry, C. F. H. “Image of God.” Evangelical Dictionary of Theology. Ed. 
		Walter E. Elwell. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1984. 545-48. 
		Holy Bible. New Revised Standard Version. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1989. 
		Kroeger, Catherine Clark, and Nancy Nason-Clark.  No Place for Abuse: 
		Biblical and
		Practical Resources to Counteract Domestic Violence. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2001. 
		Matthews, Kenneth A. The New American Commentary: Genesis 1:11:26. Vol. 
		1A. 
		Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 1996.
 |