| 
 
  
  
    	
  
  
	Articles 
  		
  		
  
	
		Breakthrough News for Women
Reprint of a newsletter article by DAVID 
FEES 
(Click here for a short bio of David Fees) 
A book God's Word to Women by Katharine Bushnell 
has recently been privately republished.  Born in 1856, the author was a medical 
missionary and a scholar of Hebrew and Greek.  Her work provides a doctrinal 
foundation to the church concerning the role of women in God's plan and in the 
church.  She scripturally breaks down some of the doctrinal and cultural biases 
that have hindered women in ministry.  What makes her different from the feminist 
movement of recent years is that she believes that the Bible is the inspired 
Word of God--verbatim.  What she has done, through much study of the Hebrew and 
Greek, a thorough knowledge of the Word', and an understanding of cultural 
settings, is explain some of the difficult passages that have historically 
brought women to a lower status than God intended. 
To give you an idea of her teachings, I have summarized 
a few of her insights concerning some of the Scriptures that may have been 
mistranslated or misinterpreted. 
	* Gen. 3:16: Unto the woman he said, I will greatly 
multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth 
children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
	 
 
Context: This statement was a judgment given by God to 
Eve for her part in the fall. 
Traditional Interpretation: The last part shows 
that men are to rule over women and that a woman's natural desire would be to 
come under that rule. 
Bushnell: The correct interpretation of the last 
part should be rendered, Thou art turning away [from God] to thy husband, and he 
will rule over thee.  In other words, when Eve turned away from God in the fall, 
she set a course for women in all history.  God did not make men to rule over 
women, but when sin entered in and rebellion and ignorance followed, women lost 
their freedom.  We see this mishap particularly in cultures which have not had a 
Christian heritage.  The greater that Jesus is allowed to flourish, the more true 
liberty will result for women.  The model is Jesus and the church.  Jesus laid 
down His life for the church.  He is head of the church but not in a dictatorial 
authority.  He brings a model of leadership, which is true humility and the 
giving of one's self for others. 
	    * I Cor. 14:34-35: Let the women keep silence in the 
churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but let them be in 
subjection, as also saith the law.  And if they would learn anything, let them 
ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church. 
 
Traditional Interpretation: The men and women 
were divided in where they sat in church.  Paul was addressing a problem in which 
women would yell out to their husbands across the church.  Paul was saying to 
address the issue at home. 
Bushnell: First, there is no law in the Old Testament 
that states this.  There are references in the Jewish Talmud that women should 
remain silent, but she doubts Paul would quote from it because he was always at 
odds with their legalism.  She makes a strong case that this statement is coming 
from the Judaizers (Jewish Christians who wanted to retain much of Jewish 
legalism), and Paul is quoting their argument and then answering it in the next 
two verses: What?   Came the word of God out from you?  Or came it unto you only?  If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that 
the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord. 
She maintains that Paul allowed the ministry of 
Priscilla and Pheobe to flourish and considered them to be a part of his 
co-laborers.  His practice of allowing them to teach would not be consistent with 
what many have traditionally interpreted that he taught.  She also points out 
that the traditional interpretation of separation of the sexes would not address 
single women who had no husband.  How would they learn? 
	* I Tim. 2:12: But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to 
usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. 
 
Traditional Interpretation: Perhaps the most 
quoted Scripture used as justification that women should not be in public 
ministry. 
Bushnell: There should be no comma after the word 
"teach", which changes the meaning of the sentence to mean that women were not 
to teach men, but could teach women.  But more importantly, she provides a 
historical context of this epistle stating that women were in great danger at 
the time of its writing.  The growth of Christianity had made believers great 
enemies of Rome and the Jews, both which treated women with disdain.  To freely 
allow women open ministry would place women at great risk, and Paul refused to 
jeopardize their status. 
She maintains that this admonition is a personal one 
similar to his suggestion to Timothy to drink some wine for his stomach's sake.  While she believes the Word of God is inviolable and absolute.  there are 
personal words given in the context of' Scriptures that are not intended for all 
believers at all times in history.  For instance, Paul told Timothy to bring 
the cloak and books with him that he had left at Troas with Carpus (II Tim. 
4:13).  Anyone would know that this piece of instruction was meant for a 
situation at that time.  No one expects us to be looking for a cloak at Troas as 
part of our spiritual obedience. 
She contends that Paul did not practice this teaching of 
refusing a woman to teach, neither did he teach it in other settings.  She states 
that while men are quick to jump on this Scripture and others like it to justify 
their view of male dominance, they do not adhere to other teachings that are in 
a similar cast such as when Paul wished that all men were single and celibate 
like himself.  Very few men have taken Paul up on that one. 
	Ephesians 5:22: Wives, submit yourselves unto your own 
husbands, as unto the Lord. 
 
Bushnell: The word submit is not the best 
rendering of this word.  A better translation, to be in subjection, does not mean 
to blindly obey.  She uses a base Scripture for this point: No man can serve two 
masters (Matt. 6:24).  The Word tells us to obey those who have the rule over us 
in Romans 12 (speaking of' civil government), but Scripture also gives us the 
right for civil disobedience when man's law tries to supercede God's law.  An 
employee cannot follow his employer into sin.  Neither can a wife follow a 
husband into immorality or deception.  Like the apostles, we must say that we 
must obey God rather than man. 
She maintains that while Sarah obeyed Abraham, calling 
him lord (I Pet. 3:6), God told Abraham in the manner of Hagar and Ishmael to 
obey his wife.  So there is a balance that must be maintained through humility 
and mutual subjection to each other. 
In ministry, she points out that Paul enjoins the 
Corinthians to submit (or subject themselves) unto every one that helpeth with 
us, and laboreth (I Cor. 16:16).  In Romans 16:3, he calls Priscilla his helper.  We know that Phoebe and other women assisted him, thus there is an admonition 
that men should be in subjection to those women ministries who are in a place of 
leadership.  No man would interpret these Scriptures to mean blind obedience, but 
rather to defer to them in mutual respect, honor, humility, meekness, 
forbearance, and the yielding of one's preferences." 
Commentary 
This book has been of great assistance to my theology.  I 
have known from observation that God called women into ministry.  Some of 
the greatest preachers of this century have been women.  C.W. Ward, who heard most of 
the leading preachers of this century, from Billy Sunday to Billy Graham to 
Kathryn Kulman, said that the most anointed person he ever heard was Aimee 
Semple McPherson in the 1930's and 40's.  She became the founder of the 
Foursquare Gospel. 
I also have known from Scripture that God used women.  One rule of Scripture interpretation is that you base your doctrine on the whole 
Word and then fit the isolated Scriptures that seem to contradict to the whole.  You do not base your doctrine on a couple of Scriptures and then try to make the 
whole fit.  Therefore.  when I see Deborah, Miriam.  Esther, Huldah, Anna, the four 
virgin daughters of Philip, Phoebe.  and Priscilla, to name a few, being used 
mightily by God, I have to understand that the practice of God is to call and 
use women.  I could not articulate theologically come of the isolated Scriptures 
that seemed to contradict that practice.  This book helps in those areas. 
Miss Bushnell's work is a refreshing and liberating work 
for both men and women.  She fights centuries of cultural male bias in the 
interpretation and application of Scripture.  At times.  she may, veer past that 
elusive area known as balance (one person's balance may be another's extremism), 
but we can give her some space for what she had to battle.  For instance, her 
views on the headship of a man in marriage seem to be borne from those of a 
single woman who never had to face some of the practicalities of marriage.  Also, 
the book does not address the principle of delegated authority, a revelation 
given to Watchman Nee in this century and developed by others.  On the other hand 
the Lord gave me a dream one night and showed me that certain elements of the 
men's movement go far past the middle road of balance and freedom.  While they 
advocate servanthood.  it is still in the context of rulership and womanless 
ministry. 
It is a rare person who does not view Scripture and 
relationship issues through the eyes of his or her gender to one degree or 
another.  We were made male and female by an all-knowing, Heavenly Father.  Men 
and women approach certain issues differently, but one is not better than the 
other.  The key word seems to be respect.  If men can understand that God not only 
uses women in ministry but scripturally confirms it, then a whole world of 
understanding would untold for many of them.  Also, many marriages could be 
greatly strengthened it' the husband would recognize the voice of his wife more.  While some men emphasize the Scripture in Ephesians that the wife is to be 
subject to the husband, that Scripture is sandwiched between one that says to 
submit to each other in the fear of the Lord and another that teaches the 
husband is to love his wife like Jesus loved the church. 
The Spirit of God is dealing with men to become leaders 
through humility and with women to boldly step up to their rightful place in 
God's Kingdom.  This is not the fleshly self-assertion of the feminist movement, 
one that eventually self-destructs women.  This is the Kingdom of God at work, 
inviting all of us to submit to one another in godly respect, love, and 
selflessness.  True authority liberates.  It brings people up, not down.  God in 
men will cause them to elevate women.  God in women will cause them to honor men.  Then we can all say that in Him we are neither male nor female.  The book is 
written in an older style that makes for somewhat tedious reading.  Also, she 
leaves no stone unturned and is extremely meticulous and detailed in her 
presentation, which contributes to her credibility but also slows down the speed 
of reading.  Yet, the work would seem to be a great asset to any serious student 
of the Word, in particular, those women who are called to ministry.  Women fight 
such an uphill battle, and this work provides a Scriptural basis for ministry. 
To order the book click 
here. 
Scripture is Finally Explained--I Timothy 2:11-14 
The rest of this newsletter was already printed and 
ready to he mailed when we obtained an article written by Don Rousu, who pastors 
the Vineyard Christian Fellowship with his wife Ruth in Edmonton, Alberta.  It is 
the most liberating truth about the main Scripture that holds people in bondage 
about women in ministry.  I got so excited that I could not sleep much that 
night.  My wife dreamed that she was proclaiming everywhere, "Did you know what 
the Scripture about women not teaching really means?"  It was so powerful that I 
had to delay the mailing and insert this page.  Please note also that the section 
on this Scripture in the article about Katharine Bushnell's book is obsolete, 
although she did realize that it was a pertinent word to a situation with which 
Timothy had to address.  So get ready, women (and men), be loosed! 
	Let a woman learn in silence with all submission.  And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to 
	be in silence.  For Adam was formed first, then Eve.  And Adam was not 
	deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression (I Timothy 
	2:11-14 NKJV). 
 
Don Rousu:  
	 "The translation hinges on the Greek verb, 
	authentein.  The problem is that this verb is found nowhere else in the 
	Bible.  From years of studying biblical languages, I know that translators 
	learn the meaning of a word by studying it in other Bible passages.  Where 
	there are no other Bible passages, they must look in comparative literature 
	of the same time period.  Although most translators of I Timothy have 
	interpreted authentein to mean 'to usurp authority' over a man, or 'to have 
	authority' over a man, such a translation violates both the context of 
	Paul's writing and the first century usage of the word in other 
	literature... 
	"Around the time the New Testament was written, the 
	most common meaning of authentein was 'to be, or claim to be the author or 
	the originator of something.' To underscore the point with a pun, this 
	appears to be the authentic translation of authentein, the crucial verb of I 
	Tim. 2:12. 
	"Not only have translators overlooked the prevailing 
	meaning of the word authentein at the time the New Testament was written, 
	but they also seem to have missed the cultural context in which Paul wrote 
	his letter to Timothy. 
	"Timothy was in Ephesus.  Ephesus was the world 
	center of paganism governed spiritually by the female deity Artemis, whom 
	the Romans called Diana.  The cult of Artemis taught the superiority of the 
	female and advocated female domination of the male.  It espoused a doctrine 
	of feminine procreation teaching that this goddess was able to bring forth 
	offspring without male involvement.  The cult was characterized by sexual 
	perversion, fertility rites, endless myths, and elaborate genealogies traced 
	through female rather than male bloodlines... 
	"Also present in Ephesus was a contingent of Jewish 
	Gnostics who represented the first century's equivalent of the New Age 
	movement.  The Greek word for 'Gnostic' is gnosis meaning 'knowledge.' 
	Gnostics acknowledged spirit guides and combined the teachings of Artemis 
	with the teachings of the Old Testament story of Adam and Eve. 
	"In the most prevalent Gnostic version of the story, 
	Eve was the 'illuminator' of mankind because she was the first to receive 
	'true knowledge' from the Serpent, whom Gnostics saw as the 'savior' and 
	revealer of truth.  Gnostics believed that Eve taught this new revelation to 
	Adam, and being the mother of all, was the progenitor of the human race.  Adam, they said, was Eve's son rather than her husband.  This belief 
	reflected the Gnostic doctrine that a female deity could bring forth 
	children without male involvement. 
	"In light of the authentic meaning of the word 
	authentein and of the social context within which Paul wrote his letters to 
	Timothy, let me offer what I believe is an appropriate rendering of the text 
	in I Timothy.  I believe Paul is saying, 'I am not allowing (present tense 
	for that situation) a woman to teach or to proclaim herself the originator 
	of man authentein.' Do you see how this translation offsets false doctrine? 
	"The word that is frequently translated 'silence,' 
	hesuchia, also means harmony, peace, conformity or agreement.  I therefore 
	suggest Paul goes on to say, 'she must be in agreement,' meaning agreement 
	with the Scriptures and with sound teaching in the Church. 
	"He continues in this vein saying, 'Adam was formed 
	first, then Eve.' This statement militates against the doctrine of Eve as 
	progenitor.  He also says, 'Adam was not deceived, but the woman was! And 
	sinned!' This statement directly contradicts the notion that Eve was the 
	'illuminator,' and carrier of new revelation." 
 
Timothy 2:11-12 (Paraphrased and Amplified) 
	[Now in response to the Gnostic teaching stemming 
	from the worship of Artemis that Eve was the originator of Adam and the 
	goddess of life], let a woman learn (in agreement with sound doctrine) with 
	all submission (to that doctrine).  And I do not permit a woman to teach that 
	she is the originator or the illuminator of man, but to be in agreement 
	(with the church).  For Adam was first formed first, then Eve.  And Adam was 
	not deceived [his was direct disobedience], but woman being deceived [thus 
	not being infallible], fell into transgression [proving that she was human.] 
 
David Fees:   There is a liberating peace from 
the Lord about this interpretation.  I believe it is THE correct one.  It 
corresponds with the practice of Paul and other Scriptures.  Men and women, be 
set free! 
Why does God seemingly wait for centuries to reveal a 
truth?  Just like being saved by faith was not revealed to Martin Luther until 
the fifteenth century, there is a time and place in the economy of God.  I now 
sense that God is going to open up other Scriptures that will totally release 
women.  There will always be those who will not believe, but that will be a heart 
problem.  There have been many well-meaning believers who did not want to violate 
the apparent translation of this Scripture, so they would not allow women in 
certain places of ministry.  Now, there is no excuse.  It will be a stubbornness 
of heart, a clinging to the old, a refusal to let go, not correct doctrine. 
Be advised, ladies.  Just as there are those today who 
still think the gifts of the Spirit have passed away, there will be those who 
never change in their view about women ministries, even if you show them in 
black and white.  But for all who will hear what the Spirit is now saying to the 
Church in this area, there is a new liberty that will march militantly against 
the gates of hell.  Women and men of all colors, in all nations, will minister 
the Gospel and bring the resurrection power of Jesus in a great harvest of 
redemption.  The work is too great for only one gender.  Let us all 
work together in the vineyard of the Lord, respecting each other and 
appreciating what God has gifted in each of us, male or female.   
  
        
        
    
		
       
		
				 |